2019 Ford Ranger Gasoline V6 Engine Review & Changes – The 2019 Ford Ranger is starting with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost inline-four, a turbocharged engine with extremely healthier specs in the Mustang and Focus RS. The new Ranger’s direct rival, the Chevrolet Colorado, delivers three engine selections. Thinking of the one-upsmanship fight raging involving the brand new 2019 Silverado 1500 (and its nevertheless strange Duramax inline-six diesel engine) and the F-150’s new diesel V6, we don’t believe Ford is making points there.
The Ford Transit gives the Power Stroke 3.2-liter engine supported up with a six-speed automatic in the United States, which is sold as a Duratorq in other regions of the community. It’s an inline-five, turbocharged diesel engine that makes 185 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque. In the Transit, it includes excellent payload and towing phone numbers: 3,280 lbs and 4,800 lbs, correspondingly. The EPA doesn’t collection fuel economy amounts for this vehicle. The most potent case for the 3.2 is that it’s basically equipped previously in global Rangers as the top-canine engine decision for some market segments. Given that the U.S. Ranger is typically the exact same to the global Ranger, it’ll, in theory, bolt proper up.
Let’s believe that the 3.2’s output stats can be unaffected in the Ranger. With a Power Stroke 3.2 under the hood, the Ranger will be quite close up to the Chevy Colorado’s available 2.8-liter Duramax turbodiesel I-4. The Duramax helps make 181 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque. Contemplating the Power Stroke’s larger displacement and greater cylinder matter, there may be some room to adjust the track to beat the Duramax, but it’s close up sufficient that Ford shouldn’t be ashamed both way. We’ve analyzed this engine in the Transit on our first drive review back in 2014. “It’s the type of a brute also, supplying 90 pct of top torque starting at 1,500 rpm. Whilst, not the pull racer the EcoBoost is, it’ll definitely pull some things. The 3.2 is envisioned to be the prime fuel economy and long-word longevity alternative, and it’d greater be contemplating it’s the most costly.” Add up the Power Stroke 3.2 a possible engine alternative for the future, notably for a Duramax ZR2-battling FX4 Level II trim, barring it upsetting crash test needs or the like.
Ford just debuted an additional light-duty (that is to say, not for massive business trucks) diesel engine in the F-150. It’s a 3.0-liter turbodiesel V6 that creates 250 hp at 3,250 rpm and 440 lb-ft of torque at 1,750 rpm. Ford hasn’t launched formal fuel economy amounts but, but it’s striving for 30 mpg on the highway. There’s no true shield avoiding Ford from detuning it somewhat for smaller sized truck work. There are a handful of queries that avoid us from expressing whether or not it’d really work in the Ranger. The global Ranger features only inline engines, which range from the 2.2-liter Duratorq inline-four to the 3.2-liter inline-five mentioned previously. There’s no crystal clear response nevertheless as to no matter if a wide dual-overhead camera V6 featuring a 60-diploma lender perspective would fit up front. For one, it’s not crystal clear the global Ranger was designed to fit a V6 from the start. We don’t determine Ford would re-engineer the engine pocket to allow it to be so. It’d also input it in competition with the larger F-150 with the very same engine, even in detuned develop.
On the contrary, a V6 of some type appears like an excellent idea for the United States, and till informed or else we’ll consider this a robust probability. Much more likely than the Powerstroke V6 is an EcoBoost V6. The 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 engine is functional and versatile. Although it features related packing worries as the Powerstroke V6, simply being an additional DOHC engine with a 60-education banking institution perspective, it’s available in a wide range of power outputs currently, starting from 315 up in the aged Edge Sport to 335 hp in some Lincoln goods. If Ford does re-engineer the engine inner compartment to cater to a V6, the 2.7 is what we should picture can be the very best fit. Visualize if Ford determined it essential a mini-Raptor to match its desert-conquering F-150 Raptor. What engine to opt for? You can’t upstage the big Raptor by adding a 3.5-liter EcoBoost into a small package. But you could give the 2.7-liter EcoBoost a very little strike, maybe up to the 335 hp/380 lb-ft spec. That may most likely provide ample of a beneficial power lump over the likeliest 2.3-liter EcoBoost track to allow it to be something great, and surely it’ll work much less challenging than the 2.3 to make big power.
At the moment? We understand Ford can certainly make the 2.3-liter EcoBoost potent ample to work properly from the Ranger’s principal competition: Colorado, not to talk about the Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier. Past that, we now have well-informed guesses, but we need to recognize that the Ranger may simply be available with the 2.3-liter EcoBoost. In that case, we’d wish the company would modify a manual transmission to work from it to fulfill truck clients who want to change for their selves. Possibly a beefed-up unit located in the EcoBoost Mustang may possibly work for that objective. Ford is likely to make the most out of this big truck disclose by doling out information and facts in little pieces. We’ll meticulously parse the tidbits and enable you to know as in the near future as we are able to attract any longer results regarding what the Ranger’s future contains.